home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
052592
/
05259915.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-24
|
2KB
|
54 lines
<text id=92TT1154>
<title>
May 25, 1992: Pollution Swap
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
May 25, 1992 Waiting For Perot
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THE WEEK, Page 22
BUSINESS
Pollution Swap
</hdr><body>
<p>Utility companies trade rights to help reduce acid rain
</p>
<p> Capitalism has created markets for some bizarre products: pet
rocks, pieces of the Beatles' hotel bed linens, even Edsels. But
last week a market to amaze even Adam Smith opened up: the
buying and selling of the right to pollute, which proves that
anything anyone wants to buy will be sold.
</p>
<p> One of the nation's cleanest utility companies, Wisconsin
Power & Light, agreed to sell pollution "credits" to two other
companies, among them one of the nation's dirtiest utilities,
the Tennessee Valley Authority. This innovative, market-based
deal, made possible under the 1990 Clean Air Act, will allow
T.V.A. and the Duquesne Light Co. of Pittsburgh to spew larger
quantities of sulfur dioxide into the air while WP&L reduces its
emissions. The arrangement is probably the first of many, and
it should help lower the overall cost of curbing acid rain,
since some utilities may opt to buy less costly rights now and
delay more expensive efforts to cut back pollution.
</p>
<p> Despite drawing praise, this marketplace has drawn fire.
"Clean air should be protected, not traded and sold like a used
car," says Christopher Blythe of the Citizens Utility Board, a
Wisconsin consumer-protection group. "What's next, the L.A.
police department trying to buy civil rights credits from
Wisconsin?" While this trading system may increase the chance
that some regions will suffer from more acid rain, it should
encourage a nationwide cleanup of SO2, which the Clean Air Act
wants to reduce by 10 million tons a year. "I'm not quite sure
what people are complaining about," says Daniel Dudek, senior
economist for the Environmental Defense Fund. "We want to
accomplish our environmental goals with the least pain possible
to the economy."
</p>
</body></article>
</text>